<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How SEO Work With Two Related WebSites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesPurple</title>
		<link>http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites/comment-page-1#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesPurple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>First : your site (raz-sports.com) is cool. It only misses some content, but it will come.

Next : Get adSense or any advertising program ! (http://index-go.com/google-services/google-adsense.asp)

You&#039;ll earn good money from your kind of site.

For the SEO matter : theres absolutely no trouble to link 2, 3 ,5 or 100 websites : look at msn, nbc, microsoft, WindowsMedia, etc. etc. It will not hurt your page rank, it&#039;s more supose to push them up.


Good luck !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First : your site (raz-sports.com) is cool. It only misses some content, but it will come.</p>
<p>Next : Get adSense or any advertising program ! (<a href="http://index-go.com/google-services/google-adsense.asp" rel="nofollow">http://index-go.com/google-services/google-adsense.asp</a>)</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll earn good money from your kind of site.</p>
<p>For the SEO matter : theres absolutely no trouble to link 2, 3 ,5 or 100 websites : look at msn, nbc, microsoft, WindowsMedia, etc. etc. It will not hurt your page rank, it&#8217;s more supose to push them up.</p>
<p>Good luck !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TradeConsult</title>
		<link>http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites/comment-page-1#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>TradeConsult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>Here is an SEO resource for you:
There is some good stuff in the Blog.

http://www.seo-web-consulting.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an SEO resource for you:<br />
There is some good stuff in the Blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seo-web-consulting.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-web-consulting.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Myklin</title>
		<link>http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites/comment-page-1#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Myklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>No, it won&#039;t hurt you BUT be careful not to run duplicate content on both sites. In the last Google update, many of the sites that lost rankings were those that appeared to be scraping content. You would want to avoid giving that impression.

Congratulations on your success to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it won&#8217;t hurt you BUT be careful not to run duplicate content on both sites. In the last Google update, many of the sites that lost rankings were those that appeared to be scraping content. You would want to avoid giving that impression.</p>
<p>Congratulations on your success to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debraM</title>
		<link>http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites/comment-page-1#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>debraM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topblogplacement.com/how-seo-work-with-two-related-websites#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>There are a couple schools of thought here when creating new sites.... you can set the trading card site up as a subdomain of the established directory and build it out.  Once it shows in the index and/or starts to rank for your terms you can create a new domain and redirect using a 301. - OR - you can create a new domain and brand it with the name of the established website and link to it from the established site so it helps get you started with seasoned, credible links.  Short answer however is - no, if the two sites are related and share terms and content focus, there is no problem to cross link.  Personally I like the second option of creating a branded domain and getting links to it before it launches better than setting up subdomains.  I just don&#039;t like the way the subdomain URL looks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple schools of thought here when creating new sites&#8230;. you can set the trading card site up as a subdomain of the established directory and build it out.  Once it shows in the index and/or starts to rank for your terms you can create a new domain and redirect using a 301. &#8211; OR &#8211; you can create a new domain and brand it with the name of the established website and link to it from the established site so it helps get you started with seasoned, credible links.  Short answer however is &#8211; no, if the two sites are related and share terms and content focus, there is no problem to cross link.  Personally I like the second option of creating a branded domain and getting links to it before it launches better than setting up subdomains.  I just don&#8217;t like the way the subdomain URL looks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

